A1. Release date conflict. Independent crash-game databases date Rocketman to 2020. Two aggregator or demo catalogues list 2022, and one review lists 2022 in its feature table. Updated position: the 2022 dates most plausibly reflect when the title was added to those catalogues or to a specific operator's lobby, not the original Elbet release. We report ~2020 with the discrepancy disclosed.
A2. RTP conflict. Published figures include 96.5% to 98.5% (operator-adjustable band), 97.4% (a single mid-band figure in a game-details panel), 96.5% (one review) and 95.5% (one B2B review's feature box). Updated position: the band is the correct representation, because the parameter is configurable; any single number is only valid for one operator's configuration. The 95.5% figure is the outlier and is not corroborated by provider documentation.
A3. Bet-limit conflict. Ranges of €0.50–€99.50 and $0.10–$100 both appear in reputable sources. Updated position: both are plausible because limits are set per operator and per currency. Verify in your own client, in your own currency.
A4. Preprint caveat (retained in full). The original formulation read: "Although this study predates the user's requested time window, it provides the clearest published mathematical characterization of crash mechanics and is therefore used here as background, with the caveat that it is a 2019 preprint rather than a 2024–2026 trial." Updated: the caveat now appears inline in section 3 as a short qualification, so the main text stays readable while the limitation remains explicit. Xu et al. (2019) is a preprint, is not peer-reviewed, and does not analyse Rocketman.
A5. RTP worked example attribution (retained). The illustrative calculation "if a game designed with RTP of 91.68%…" previously appeared without inline attribution. Updated: it is now presented in section 5 immediately after the attributed quotation from the UK Gambling Commission's How to calculate return to player (RTP) guidance, so the arithmetic logic is traceable to its regulatory source.
A6. Claims flagged as unverified in this article. (1) The "vertical framing / weird psychological effect" claim is provider marketing, unsupported by research. (2) The 3.5% house-edge figure at 96.5% RTP rests on supplier-declared parameters with no publicly available independent certification per band. (3) Crash-specific arousal dynamics are plausible but untested. (4) The link between regional gambling preference and crash-game uptake is an inference, not a finding. (5) Mobile load-speed and per-browser benchmarks for Rocketman are not published. (6) Canadian operator coverage for Rocketman changes month to month; we do not publish a fixed list.
A7. Competitor claims we deliberately do not repeat. "5-reel, 3-row layout with 25 paylines", "Astro Wilds", "Comet Scatters" and "Rocket Launch Bonus" are not features of Rocketman by Elbet. Any source attributing them to Elbet's crash game is describing a game that does not exist.